.

Sustainable Redwood City Makes a Big Change

Members say, they'll no longer be asking for your money.

Sustainable Redwood City is not the same nonprofit organization it used to be.

In fact, it's not a nonprofit organization anymore at all.

However, that doesn't mean they aren't still going strong, aiming to spread awareness about issues that affect people who live and work in Redwood City and inspire the kind of change that will keep the city moving forward and improving, so it's around for years to come.

Lou Covey, Patch blogger and Sustainable Redwood City (SRC) member shared the news this week that the organization has decided to take a huge step, and de-incorporate.

"So, we are no longer a 501(c)4 organization," he said. "That means, we can no longer accept or raise money."

While some might think that being unable to collect any money at all anymore sounds like a death sentence to a nonprofit, Covey said, it's actually great news, and, he thinks, a really smart move.

He explained, the shift will allow the organization to really free itself from the burdens of fundraising, complying with tax laws, and doing all the cumbersome administration and legal work that goes along with being a tax-exempt, incorporated nonprofit.

He added, he thinks it is the way a lot of nonprofits will decide to go in the 21st century, calling it, "the wave of the future."

"All of that work took so much time and effort," he said. "Now, we can just concentrate on the issues."

So, how does an organization strip itself of all its cash, and still stay afloat? A lot of that just took care of itself when they de-incorporated, he said - by eliminating the work, they eliminated a lot of their expenses.

For example, Covey said, the organization noticed that it was getting a lot of traffic and engagement through its Facebook page versus on its traditional website - so, they did away with the website.

"Having a website costs money; Facebook is free. And, I was paying a lot of the organization's legal fees out of my own pocket," he said, explaining that none of that legal help or those fees are necessary if they are no longer an incorporated nonprofit.

Covey said, he also thinks freeing themselves of needing to ask for donations will help them operate more objectively and avoid the "politics" that can sometimes come with being a nonprofit.

"One of the primary arguments against what we do was that we were 'bought and paid for' by whoever bought and paid for us," he said. "So, now, we want to try and interact with the community as objectively as possible."

"We’ve decided to go grassroots. The only thing we’re asking from people now, truly, is their time," he continued. "We think we’ll be a lot more effective going forward."

What are Sustainable Redwood City's positions?

What is it that SRC is working toward?

Covey said, they group aims primarily to help spread awareness, and call attention to facts about different local issues based on thoughtful research.

"We’re here to see Redwood City become a sustainable community, and find ways to do that more effectively," he said.

The following are a few of the group's main issues of concern.

"Effective Housing"

Covey said, he finds the term "effective housing" better than "affordable housing," because "affordable" is such a subjective term. What he means, he said, is to make sure there's enough housing for everyone in Redwood City, and apply better city planning so that Redwood City is a more pedestrian- and commuter-friendly city.

"Housing in Redwood City is really lacking – not just affordable housing, but housing, period," he said.

Covey said he is friends with many business entrepreneurs from other areas, including Europe, that have told him many times they would love to start a business in Redwood City if only the city had a good business hotel, more housing, and better public transit, such as an inner-city light rail system that goes through downtown.

Covey said he is encouraged by the fact that either being built now or in the planning stages.

Bringing in new tax revenues without raising taxes

Obviously, this one is a challenge, but one Covey said the members of SRC want to help city officials explore.

He said, approving new housing developments and attracting new businesses are examples of two ways he think this can be done.

New developments bring in money for street repairs, schools, and building levees to protect inland areas like Bair Island and Don Edwards, he said. New businesses bring in added tax revenue.

"But, if we bring in more businesses, we also need to be able to provide them with places to live and park," he pointed out.

Concerns about gun crimes

A resident of the Friendly Acres neighborhood, Covey said, "There's not many a night that goes by that we don't hear some sort of gunfire."

Covey said, he is friends with many a responsible gun owner that "doesn't feel the need to go shooting off his gun irresponsibly all the time," so he doesn't necessarily think stricter gun laws is the way to go; and it's definitely a challenge to try and think up ways to keep guns out of the hands of criminals.

He said, he and other members of SRC will be meeting soon with Congresswoman Jackie Speier, Senator Dianne Feinstein and State Senator Jerry Hill to brainstorm this issue, and he briefly talked about an RFID-chip project that may be a potential solution.

The idea puts 15-cent RFID chips into guns - either at the time of manufacturing, or through inexpensive kits that can be sold to add them to existing guns - and then places RFID sensors in places such as schools, parks and other public places so that, if anyone carrying a gun enters one of those locations, the authorities are silently notified immediately and can respond, hopefully before anything dangerous happens.

Education

Lastly, SRC wants to help brainstorm ways to make our local schools more effective.

"The quality of our schools - that's a big reason for people to move into the area," he said.

When asked if he worried that more schools would be needed to serve the families that could soon move into the roughly 1,800 new homes being built in Redwood City, Covey said, "You can’t build new schools until you have the revenue."

"Our schools have enough room to be able to expand, but they have to have the money to be able to do that."

All in all, Covey said SRC's primary objective is to help research solutions to local problems of sustainability, and start a dialogue with local influencers.

"We're here to provide information; to research stuff and come back and say, 'this looks like a good way to go.'"

For more information on Sustainable Redwood City, visit their Facebook page.

Keep up with the pulse of your community - follow Patch!

Sign up for Redwood City-Woodside Patch’s daily newsletter
"Like” us on Facebook
"Follow” us on Twitter

Want to share your opinions with the communities of Redwood City and Woodside? Start your own blog here.

Lou Covey, The Local Motive January 18, 2013 at 06:03 PM
The reality about development along the corridor is that those people who own the properties know it is more valuable than any business they might have there. in fact, most of the businesses lease the property. The owners are just sitting on their hands waiting to hear from developers, and even hoping that eminent domain kicks in because that is the most valuable property in the city. That's also why affordable housing can't be built in any significance there. The cost of the property precludes much of that.
Buck Shaw January 19, 2013 at 01:41 AM
Ok I'll accept "old coot" even if it was skillfully sideways. But you have to admit as your straight man it allows you the oppertunity to explan it and get it out there? Just don't like Gov. doing all the changes. You suppose all of this generation you speak of like being put in catagories and accepts it. What do I know being an Old Coot and all.
Alison Madden January 21, 2013 at 06:34 PM
Jennifer, as the editor of Patch it would seem most appropriate to let the comments take care of themselves, rather than stepping in. You seem like a defender of Lou and not impartial. Also funny that Lou told me months ago that his org never takes a dime, now it seems it always has? And he did take $ from Mrs. Uccelli and now does not support the affordable / efficient / effective housing of floating communities (the RWC General Plan lauds liveaboards and floating communities of both Pete's and Docktown, not just the 'floating homes' as defined in one statute. This group is a front for gentrification, not real development, and no Redwood City citizen should have to leave town when displaced by a high end development. Not a single one. I hope that we can get to Jackie, Anna, Jerry and all the others as well. I support a light rail and effective public transport around town, and mixed use and affordable housing in RWC, planned well with all parties and in the light. cheers.
Lou Covey, The Local Motive January 21, 2013 at 08:42 PM
As usual, Ms. Madden twists what she know to be true to slander those she does not know at all, all to advance her own personal agenda and to the detriment of the Redwood City public.
Barb Valley January 22, 2013 at 01:19 AM
Allison, it was most appropriate for Jennifer to respond to Chris Krug’s comment (after having read the article, he was still am unclear on where SRC would get it's funding) since she was the author of the article. Regarding Lou’s accepting a donation from Paula Uccelli, aren’t you and your friend, Occupy Cargill, getting tired of beating that dead horse?

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »