Politics & Government

Poll: Will The Approved Pension Reform Bill Really Help Us?

Before adjourning, state lawmakers passed a bill late Friday that could cut pension costs by billions of dollars. Critics say the bill has loopholes that may make things even worse.

 

On Friday, California state legislators passed a reform measure that is expected to put new limits on pensions for future state and local government employees, saving billions of dollars in retirement spending.

The bill, AB340, passed 49-8 in the Assembly and 38-1 in the state Senate.

Find out what's happening in Mountain Viewwith free, real-time updates from Patch.

Brought forward by Governor Jerry Brown on Tuesday, the new law - if signed by Brown - could cut $40 billion to $60 billion in pension expenses for government employers over the next 30 years, according to the California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS), the largest public pension fund in the United States.

According to the Huffington Post, the legislation will increase the retirement age for new employees, cap the annual payout at $132,120, eliminate numerous abuses of the system and require workers who are not contributing half of their retirement costs to pay more.

Find out what's happening in Mountain Viewwith free, real-time updates from Patch.

State and local governments have been struggling to meet the demands of long-held pension promises to retirees while their abilities to pay shrink.

Public employee unions are unhappy about the agreement, and complained that Democrats who normally support their causes in Sacramento had abandoned them.

Others felt the legislation did not go far enough.

"I hope people acknowledge there is much, much more work to be done," said Joe Nation, a former Democratic member of the state Assembly who now teaches public policy at Stanford University in an interview with Reuters. "It's better than moving backwards but this barely moves the ball forward."

Nation in recent years has overseen studies warning California and its local governments face unfunded pension liabilities that stretch into the hundreds of billions of dollars.

Pension costs contributed to the bankruptcy filings of Stockton and San Bernardino this year.

"Because we are so under water right now there just really has to be more," Nation told Reuters.

In our Silicon Valley Patch towns, annual pensions are noted on a database compiled by the Bay Area News Group. According to that database, here are some of the most highly compensated pension recipients in our towns:

 

City Name 2011 Gross Pension Years of Service Campbell Johanna Vandermolen $267,005.47 40 Patricia Gregory $176,478.23 41 Owen Hege $152,222.00 43 Cupertino Paul Cheng $197,612.39 38 Keet Hamilton $180,863.00 40 William Bragg $178,959.98 38 Los Altos Timothy Justus $206,113.61 38 Margaret Gratiot $179,335.40 37 Patricia Weisman $152,324.36 36 Los Gatos Suzanne Boxer-Gassman $136,619.48 29 Charlotte Basinger $124,372.76 39 Robert Skuse $121,951.28 41 Mountain View Cathy Remson-Lazarus $183,526.92 37 Richard Fisher $181,106.16 38 Michael Young $175,286.20 32

What do you think? Will this reform measure being sent to Governor Brown help the economies of our state and our cities? Should there be a cap on the amount a person can earn from a pension?

Let us know in your comments. Then vote in our poll. 


Get more local news delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for free Patch newsletters and alerts.

We’ve removed the ability to reply as we work to make improvements. Learn more here